Credit Suisse Sues Billionaire Over Rogue-Banker Report

This content was published on April 29, 2021 - 16:57

(Bloomberg) -- Credit Suisse Group AG is suing a Georgian billionaire and his communications adviser over their decision to publish a copy of a report from Switzerland’s banking regulator on its handling of a former banker convicted of fraud.

The two sides locked horns in a court hearing in London on Thursday, where late in the day Credit Suisse won an extension of an injunction forcing the report to be removed from the website until a trial is held. The public relations firm behind the website, Metigen, had asked the court to lift the injunction.

Judge Rowena Collins Rice said that she made this ruling on the basis that the bank is more likely than not to succeed on its claim for confidentiality at trial, a legal test it had to pass in order to get the injunction extended. A date for trial has not yet been set. Lawyers for Metigen said they would like to apply for permission to appeal the decision.

The dispute is the latest in a long-running battle between the Swiss bank and investors who fell victim to Patrice Lescaudron, who was convicted of orchestrating a scheme to fake trades to cover losses that ran into the millions of dollars. The investors, including former Georgian Prime Minister Bidzina Ivanishvili who is also a defendant in the London lawsuit, believe Credit Suisse should bear some responsibility for the rogue banker’s crimes.

In February, Metigen posted a copy of the critical 2017 report, authored by a Zurich law firm hired by finance regulator Finma, even after Credit Suisse had previously won a ruling from a Swiss court keeping the document confidential.


Given extracts from the report have already been quoted in the media, “it’s outrageous that the only people who Credit Suisse are trying to prevent from using the report are the victims of the crimes,” Metigen’s director, Charlie Wigan, said in a statement before today’s hearing.

Credit Suisse declined to comment on the lawsuit, as did a spokesman for Finma.

Earlier at Thursday’s hearing, David Scorey, a lawyer for the bank, said it didn’t seek an injunction against other media outlets because it was only concerned with protecting publication of the report.

That “only happened on this website,” Scorey said. He asked for the injunction to remain in place until trial.

Gregory Banner, a lawyer for Metigen, said that there is a “conflation between the report as a document and information within the report.”

“At no time have they identified particular information contained in the report which it says is confidential,” he said.

Judge Collins Rice said she had a “slight niggle” in her mind over a point of jurisdiction. While the website is in English, Ivanishvili is a private citizen who lives outside the U.K. She asked the bank’s lawyer to clarify this afternoon on what basis he was asking her to “restrain his overseas activities.”

Mounting Losses

The dispute comes as Credit Suisse faces heavy criticism after mounting losses linked to the failures of hedge fund Archegos Capital Management and supply chain finance group Greensill Capital.

“The report was commissioned by Finma, not Credit Suisse and the detail of findings are in the public interest -- particularly in light of the recent Archegos and Greensill scandals which demonstrate ongoing risk management issues within Credit Suisse,” Metigen’s Wigan said in the statement.

The Lescaudron case exploded in 2015 when the former star private wealth manager at Credit Suisse with a roster of Russian clients confessed to forging signatures, manipulating spreadsheets and faking trades to try to buy time to recover from heavy losses he first incurred in 2008. Lescaudron’s scheme went undetected for more than seven years until a massive bet on a single drug stock in the U.S. went badly wrong and exposed his fraud.

The bank has consistently argued that Lescaudron, who committed suicide last year, was a lone wolf who hid his wrongdoing from his colleagues and supervisors. He was convicted at a trial in 2018 and sentenced to five years in prison, but was released less than 10 months later on health ground and because he’d already served two years in pretrial detention.

(Adds extension of injunction in second paragraph)

©2021 Bloomberg L.P.

Share this story

Join the conversation!

With a SWI account, you have the opportunity to contribute on our website.

You can Login or register here.