Swatch slams regulator’s ban on its watch parts

Swatch claims that ETA no longer holds a dominant position for supplying watch parts in Switzerland. Keystone

Switzerland’s largest watch manufacturer, Swatch, has slammed a decision by the anti-trust regulator to prevent it from selling watch parts to larger customers from the start of next year. Swatch says it is considering suing the Competitions Commission (Comco) for damages.

This content was published on December 19, 2019 - 13:13

ComcoExternal link decided on Wednesday to temporarily suspend deliveries of watch movements from Swatch’s ETA unit to big rivals from January 1, 2020. But the regulator added that it would revisit the issue, most likely next summer.

The Federation of the Swiss Watch IndustryExternal link said Comco’s decision “brings a lot of insecurities for the watch sector”, particularly for 2020.

“It is important for us that Swiss brands get all the mechanical movements they need and that they have enough time to plan the production of watches. Several brands and suppliers told us that there are not enough Swiss mechanical movements on the market. But we need Swiss movements in order to produce Swiss watches. I fear that this decision could contribute to the reduction of Swiss watch exports,” federation president Jean-Daniel Pasche said in an emailed statement to

But Comco defended its decision, arguing that it would not have such a significant impact on the market. “Is there really going to be a shortage of watch movements? I'm not sure. There's also a grey market and brands have built inventories,” Comco director Patrik Ducrey told Reuters.

Comco's verdict was the latest twist in a long-running saga dating back more than a decade when Swatch declared its intention to stop supplying watch parts to competitors, saying that its monopoly was stifling innovation. The decision caused consternation in the Swiss watch industry as at that time ETA had a monopoly in the market for producing many parts essential for assembling time pieces.

In 2013, Swatch struck a deal with Comco to continue supplying parts until the end of 2019. But in the meantime, other companies, such as SellitaExternal link, developed their own capacity for producing movements. Because of this, Swatch now saysExternal link that Comco’s latest “incomprehensible and unacceptable” decision has merely served to “reinforce the positioning of a new dominant player [Sellita]”.

This will in turn harm the industry, says Swatch, particularly as the late timing of the decision will not give watchmakers time to prepare for the changes.

Swatch complains that Comco is “effectively driving ETA out of the market” and states that it is “de facto impossible” for it to continue to supply small companies with watch parts, which would be allowed by the regulator.

This article was automatically imported from our old content management system. If you see any display errors, please let us know:

Contributions under this article have been turned off. You can find an overview of ongoing debates with our journalists here. Please join us!

If you want to start a conversation about a topic raised in this article or want to report factual errors, email us at

Share this story

Change your password

Do you really want to delete your profile?